This reduced performance, however, translates to lower power consumption and allows it to last almost half an hour longer. document.write(''); Your email address will not be published. To keep things fair between the two phones, both the Snapdragon and Exynos variants of the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra were kept at the default Full HD resolution. The rest of the world has to contend with the Exynos 2100 variant. That said, if your usage involves a lot of gaming, the Snapdragon version is still the way to go, if you can get your hands on it. 'params' : {} The Adreno 660 helps execute 10 rounds of Speed Test G in 26.28 seconds. 'width' : 300, Snapdragon SoC guide: All of Qualcomm’s smartphone processors explained. For now, however, Samsung claims a 40% improvement in graphics performance over the outgoing chip. For these of you hankering for extra particulars on the numbers themselves, we’ll begin with the two on-screen exams – internet searching and offline video playback. However, opened up full throttle, the Snapdragon 888 variant lasts 199 minutes — a full 27 minutes lower than the Exynos variant which managed to run for 226 minutes. Which is due to the CPU temperature. Hopefully, this marks the starting of a brand new equality pattern in camp Samsung for good. 's' : '') + '://bitingcomposed.com/3ec79cb63778b74c204e862ba35454d0/invoke.js">'); }; Join 150,000+ subscribers to get a weekly digest of the week's most critical tech developments! The Exynos 2100 version of the Galaxy S21 Ultra triumphed over its principally U.S.-bound counterpart in a new battery drain test. Compared to the Exynos 990, there are significant gains to be seen here. It gets a score of 1,109 points vs the 1,098 points scored by the Snapdragon-equipped Galaxy S21 Ultra. The Exynos 2100, on the other hand, is once again clocked higher at 2.8GHz. With Samsung licensing AMD’s Radeon technology to improve its GPU game, the next generation of Exynos chipsets should have what it takes to match or even exceed Qualcomm’s offering.